A Fresh Record, Then a Pullback
The Invesco QQQ Trust closed at a fresh all-time high this week (21/9/2026) near $747, continuing a rally that has pushed the fund up sharply since its July low. That climb stalled a bit today, with QQQ pulling back alongside a broader rotation out of growth stocks as Treasury yields jumped to their highest level in nearly two decades. For anyone who read our earlier piece on VOO and SPY, the two funds that track the S&P 500, QQQ might look similar at first glance, another large, well known, heavily traded ETF. In practice, it behaves quite differently, and understanding why is genuinely useful whether you are new to ETFs or already comfortable with them.
What QQQ Actually Tracks
QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100, an index made up of the 100 largest non financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange. That single rule, non financial companies only, is a big part of why QQQ ends up looking so different from a broad market fund. Banks, insurers, and other financial firms are excluded entirely, no matter how large they are. What is left over skews heavily toward technology, communication services, and consumer facing companies, since those sectors dominate the Nasdaq exchange itself.
Why Concentration Matters Here
The most important thing to understand about QQQ is just how concentrated it is. As of this month, the ten largest holdings make up close to 48% of the entire fund, and the single largest position, Nvidia, sits close to 8% or 9% on its own. A handful of familiar names, Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and a few others, effectively drive most of the fund's daily movement. Technology alone accounts for roughly two thirds of QQQ's total weight.
This is a meaningfully different experience than owning a broad market fund like VOO, which spreads its weight across 500 companies from every sector of the economy, financials, healthcare, energy, industrials, and more. When one or two of QQQ's largest holdings have a strong or weak day, or a big earnings report, the entire fund tends to move with them. That is not necessarily a flaw. It is simply the tradeoff for owning a fund built around a small group of the fastest growing, most talked about companies in the market rather than the market as a whole.
What This Means in Practice
The concentration is exactly why QQQ has performed as well as it has over the past several years, since the very companies driving so much of the fund's weight have also been some of the strongest performers in the market. It is also why QQQ tends to swing harder in both directions than a broader fund would, rallying more sharply when those names do well, and pulling back more sharply when investors rotate away from growth stocks, the way we saw happen briefly this week.
QQQ also pays very little in dividends, typically under half a percent annually, since most of the companies inside it favor reinvesting profits and buying back stock rather than distributing cash to shareholders. That makes it a poor fit for anyone specifically looking for income, and a better fit for someone comfortable prioritizing growth and reinvestment over a steady payout.
Thinking About Fit
None of this makes QQQ a better or worse choice than a broad market fund, it simply serves a different purpose. Owning QQQ alongside a broad index fund can make sense for someone who wants extra exposure to a handful of large, fast growing companies without picking those stocks individually, as long as they understand that concentration cuts both ways. Owning QQQ as a complete substitute for a diversified portfolio is a different decision entirely, since it leaves out entire sectors of the economy that a broad fund would otherwise include.
Sources:
Research investments with Stock Analysis
Stock Analysis puts company financials, ETFs and market data in one place, so you can check the numbers behind any idea in this newsletter yourself. Free to use, with Stock Analysis Pro available if you want more.
Use code COVINX for 10% off Stock Analysis Pro.
How useful was this issue of Covinx?
Want us to explore a specific company, stock, or ETF next? Just reply to this email and tell us which one.

